I thought i would repost this idea that was originally suggested here:-
http://board.kingsage.org/board17-archiv…e-member-limit/
Should there be a maximum member limit for alliances, either fixed or upgradeable?
I think that more smaller alliances would create more borders and more conflicts between alliances and we would have many small scale wars as opposed to the 1 massive alliance against the other massive alliance that tends to happen across the older worlds. using world 3 as an example ever since the early days there has always been at least 2 massive alliances that have dominated with the majority of the players spread amongst them, whereas they used to boast 200-300 members now they have a little over 50. inevitably these large alliances have many members that are too far from the front line to actively take part and smaller alliances can get isolated from their enemies and surrounded by a large ally or nap. Worlds tend to stagnate and players get bored and leave, this may help keep the excitement going for a little bit longer and keep players in the game.
What do you think?